FIGHT MISINFORMATION

Join our community of annotators!

Help us stop the spread of misinformation. Train as a citizen scientist to identify misinformation through a self-directed online curriculum! You will learn to identify issues with probability, language, reasoning, evidence and sources. The labels from our community will be shared with news readers across the word.

READ SMARTER

Spot misleading info while you read

Get in-line media training to identify misleading information, including issues with probability, language, reasoning, evidence and sources. If we haven’t reviewed a news article yet, you can send it our way.

Sign up for our newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive news and updates about whatever is happening at Public Editor!

Labeling misinformation to Share Reality Again!

Public Editor is a collective intelligence system that labels specific reasoning mistakes in the daily news, so we all learn to avoid biased thinking.

Understand the news where you read

Newsreaders view labeled articles using our Chrome extension, newsfeed, or newsletter. Each article is given a credibility score (learn more) & is layered with in-line explanations detailing each type of reasoning error.

A reasoning checker not a fact checker.

We evaluate how claims are made, ensuring they use sound reasoning and solid evidence from credible sources, without misleading rhetoric.

Bi-Partisan Annotation

Misleading information is labeled by “annotators” who represent diverse political standpoints. Anyone can sign-up to participate as an annotator.

Annotating is a team effort!

Some annotators identify potentially misleading information within articles, while others label the specific types of misleading information.

Labels use Consensus

Public Editor has a built-in process to find consensus among annotators, requiring at least 2 of 3 annotators independently apply the same label before it is displayed on an article.

Reliable

A study comparing Public Editor’s output to EU experts showed that Public Editor identifies the same mistakes as experts in 94% of articles and finds additional mistakes in 86%.

CAN’T FIND WHAT YOU WERE LOOKING FOR?

Select other ways you can get involved!

HELP US CORRECT MISINFORMATION

Play your part to preserve our democratic values!

We need your help to ensure we can continue identifying misinformation and building trust in a shared reality.

Donate online

OR

Sponsors helping us improve media literacy across the globe!

Schmidt Futures logo
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation logo
McCune Foundation Logo
National Science Foundation (NSF) logo
Sage Publishing logo

Partners

Berkeley Institute of Data Science (BIDS) Logo
Alliance4Europe Logo
World Economic Forum Logo
SciStarter Logo
hypothes.is logo
Media Smarts Logo
Massachusets Institute of Technology (MIT) Logo
Harvard Logo
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Logo
Simon Fraser University Logo
Library of Congress Logo